factanal {stats} | R Documentation

## Factor Analysis

### Description

Perform maximum-likelihood factor analysis on a covariance matrix or data matrix.

### Usage

    factanal(x, factors, data = NULL, covmat = NULL, n.obs = NA,
             subset, na.action, start = NULL,
             scores = c("none", "regression", "Bartlett"),
             rotation = "varimax", control = NULL, ...)

### Arguments

`x` | A formula or a numeric matrix or an object that can be coerced to a numeric matrix.
`factors` | The number of factors to be fitted.
`data` | An optional data frame (or similar: see `model.frame`), used only if `x` is a formula. By default the variables are taken from `environment(formula)`.
`covmat` | A covariance matrix, or a covariance list as returned by `cov.wt`. Of course, correlation matrices are covariance matrices.
`n.obs` | The number of observations, used if `covmat` is a covariance matrix.
`subset` | A specification of the cases to be used, if `x` is used as a matrix or formula.
`na.action` | The `na.action` to be used if `x` is used as a formula.
`start` | `NULL` or a matrix of starting values, each column giving an initial set of uniquenesses.
`scores` | Type of scores to produce, if any. The default is none, `"regression"` gives Thompson's scores, `"Bartlett"` given Bartlett's weighted least-squares scores. Partial matching allows these names to be abbreviated.
`rotation` | character. `"none"` or the name of a function to be used to rotate the factors: it will be called with first argument the loadings matrix, and should return a list with component `loadings` giving the rotated loadings, or just the rotated loadings.
`control` | A list of control values, nstart The number of starting values to be tried if `start = NULL`. Default 1. trace logical. Output tracing information? Default `FALSE`. lower The lower bound for uniquenesses during optimization. Should be > 0. Default 0.005. opt A list of control values to be passed to `optim`'s `control` argument. rotate a list of additional arguments for the rotation function.
`...` | Components of `control` can also be supplied as named arguments to `factanal`.

### Details

The factor analysis model is

x = Lambda f + e

for a p–element row-vector x, a p x k matrix of loadings, a k–element vector of scores and a p–element vector of errors. None of the components other than x is observed, but the major restriction is that the scores be uncorrelated and of unit variance, and that the errors be independent with variances Phi, the uniquenesses. Thus factor analysis is in essence a model for the covariance matrix of x,

Sigma = Lambda'Lambda + Psi

There is still some indeterminacy in the model for it is unchanged if Lambda is replaced by G Lambda for any orthogonal matrix G. Such matrices G are known as rotations (although the term is applied also to non-orthogonal invertible matrices).

If `covmat` is supplied it is used. Otherwise `x` is used if it is a matrix, or a formula `x` is used with `data` to construct a model matrix, and that is used to construct a covariance matrix. (It makes no sense for the formula to have a response, and all the variables must be numeric.) Once a covariance matrix is found or calculated from `x`, it is converted to a correlation matrix for analysis. The correlation matrix is returned as component `correlation` of the result.

The fit is done by optimizing the log likelihood assuming multivariate normality over the uniquenesses. (The maximizing loadings for given uniquenesses can be found analytically: Lawley & Maxwell (1971, p. 27).) All the starting values supplied in `start` are tried in turn and the best fit obtained is used. If `start = NULL` then the first fit is started at the value suggested by Jöreskog (1963) and given by Lawley & Maxwell (1971, p. 31), and then `control$nstart - 1` other values are tried, randomly selected as equal values of the uniquenesses.

The uniquenesses are technically constrained to lie in [0, 1], but near-zero values are problematical, and the optimization is done with a lower bound of `control$lower`, default 0.005 (Lawley & Maxwell, 1971, p. 32).

Scores can only be produced if a data matrix is supplied and used. The first method is the regression method of Thomson (1951), the second the weighted least squares method of Bartlett (1937, 8). Both are estimates of the unobserved scores f. Thomson's method regresses (in the population) the unknown f on x to yield

hat f = Lambda' Sigma^-1 x

and then substitutes the sample estimates of the quantities on the right-hand side. Bartlett's method minimizes the sum of squares of standardized errors over the choice of f, given (the fitted) Lambda.

If `x` is a formula then the standard NA-handling is applied to the scores (if requested): see `napredict`.

### Value

An object of class `"factanal"` with components

`loadings` | A matrix of loadings, one column for each factor. The factors are ordered in decreasing order of sums of squares of loadings, and given the sign that will make the sum of the loadings positive.
`uniquenesses` | The uniquenesses computed.
`correlation` | The correlation matrix used.
`criteria` | The results of the optimization: the value of the negative log-likelihood and information on the iterations used.
`factors` | The argument `factors`.
`dof` | The number of degrees of freedom of the factor analysis model.
`method` | The method: always `"mle"`.
`scores` | If requested, a matrix of scores. `napredict` is applied to handle the treatment of values omitted by the `na.action`.
`n.obs` | The number of observations if available, or `NA`.
`call` | The matched call.
`na.action` | If relevant.
`STATISTIC, PVAL` | The significance-test statistic and P value, if if can be computed.

### Note

There are so many variations on factor analysis that it is hard to compare output from different programs. Further, the optimization in maximum likelihood factor analysis is hard, and many other examples we compared had less good fits than produced by this function. In particular, solutions which are Heywood cases (with one or more uniquenesses essentially zero) are much often common than most texts and some other programs would lead one to believe.

### References

Bartlett, M. S. (1937) The statistical conception of mental factors. British Journal of Psychology, 28, 97–104.

Bartlett, M. S. (1938) Methods of estimating mental factors. Nature, 141, 609–610.

Jöreskog, K. G. (1963) Statistical Estimation in Factor Analysis. Almqvist and Wicksell.

Lawley, D. N. and Maxwell, A. E. (1971) Factor Analysis as a Statistical Method. Second edition. Butterworths.

Thomson, G. H. (1951) The Factorial Analysis of Human Ability. London University Press.

### See Also

`print.loadings`, `varimax`, `princomp`, `ability.cov`, `Harman23.cor`, `Harman74.cor`

### Examples

    # A little demonstration, v2 is just v1 with noise,
    # and same for v4 vs. v3 and v6 vs. v5
    # Last four cases are there to add noise
    # and introduce a positive manifold (g factor)
    v1 <- c(1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,3,3,3,3,3,4,5,6)
    v2 <- c(1,2,1,1,1,1,2,1,2,1,3,4,3,3,3,4,6,5)
    v3 <- c(3,3,3,3,3,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,5,4,6)
    v4 <- c(3,3,4,3,3,1,1,2,1,1,1,1,2,1,1,5,6,4)
    v5 <- c(1,1,1,1,1,3,3,3,3,3,1,1,1,1,1,6,4,5)
    v6 <- c(1,1,1,2,1,3,3,3,4,3,1,1,1,2,1,6,5,4)
    m1 <- cbind(v1,v2,v3,v4,v5,v6)
    cor(m1)
    factanal(m1, factors=3) # varimax is the default
    factanal(m1, factors=3, rotation="promax")
    # The following shows the g factor as PC1
    prcomp(m1)

    ## formula interface
    factanal(~v1+v2+v3+v4+v5+v6, factors = 3,
             scores = "Bartlett")$scores

    ## a realistic example from Bartholomew (1987, pp. 61-65)
    utils::example(ability.cov)

[Package stats version 2.8.1 Index]