## GData Overview

GData Overview — overview of libgdata's architecture

## Introduction

libgdata is a library to allow access to web services using the GData protocol from the desktop. The GData protocol is a simple protocol for reading and writing data on the web, designed by Google.

### Protocol

The GData protocol is designed by Google to allow interaction with their web services. It is based on the Atom Publishing protocol, with namespaced XML additions. Communication between the client and server is broadly achieved through HTTP requests with query parameters, and Atom feeds being returned with result entries. Each service has its own namespaced additions to the GData protocol; for example, the Google Calendar service's API has specialisations for addresses and time periods.

Figure 1.

An overview of the data flow when making a request of a GData service.

Results are always returned in the form of result feeds, containing multiple entries. How the entries are interpreted depends on what was queried of the service, but when using libgdata, this is all taken care of transparently.

### Structure

The basic design of libgdata mirrors the protocol's structure quite closely:

Figure 2.

An overview of the libgdata class structure.

GDataService

Subclassed for each different web service implemented, this class represents a single client's connection to the relevant web service, holding their authentication state, and making the necessary requests to read and write data to and from the service. All top-level actions, such as creating a new object on the server, are carried out through a service.

There should be one GDataService subclass for each of the services listed in the GData documentation.

GDataQuery

For queries to have multiple individual parameters, a GDataQuery can be used to specify the parameters.

Query objects are optional, and can only be used with queries (not with entry insertions, updates or deletions). The query object builds the query URI used by the GDataService when sending the query to the server.

Services can subclass GDataQuery if the service supports non-standard query parameters.

GDataFeed

Effectively a list of GDataEntrys, the GDataFeed class is a direct counterpart of the root <feed> element in the Atom feeds which form the GData protocol. It contains the elements in a query response, as well as general information about the response, such as links to related feeds and the categories under which the query response falls.

GDataFeed is usually not subclassed by services, as there are rarely service-specific elements in a feed itself.

GDataEntry

A GDataEntry is a direct counterpart of the <entry> element in the Atom feeds which form the GData protocol. It represents a single object of unspecified semantics; an entry could be anything from a calendar event to a video comment or access control rule. Semantics are given to entries by subclassing GDataEntry for the various types of entries returned by queries to a service. Such subclasses implement useful, relevant and query-specific properties on the entry (such as the duration of a video, or the recurrence rules of a calendar event).

## Development Philosophy

As the GData protocol (and all the service-specific protocols which extend it) is reasonably young, it is subject to fairly frequent updates and expansions. While backwards compatibility is maintained, these updates necessitate that libgdata remains fairly flexible in how it treats data. The sections below detail some of the ways in which libgdata achieves this, and the reasoning behind them, as well as other major design decisions behind libgdata's API.

### Enumerable Properties

There are many class properties in libgdata which should, at first glance, be implemented as enumerated types. Function calls such as `gdata_link_get_relation_type()` and `gdata_gd_im_address_get_protocol()` would, in a conventional library, return a value from an enum, which would work well, and be more typesafe and memory-efficient than using arbitrary strings.

However, such an implementation would not be forwards-compatible. If a protocol addition was made which added another link relation type, or added supportf or another IM protocol, there would be no way for libgdata to represent some of the data it retrieved from the server. It could return an "other" value from the enum, but that could lead to data loss in the common case of GData entries being queried from the server, processed, then updated again.

For this reason – which is made more troublesome by the fact that it is unpredictable when updates to the protocol are released, or when updated XML will start coming over the wire – libgdata uses enumerated types sparingly; they are only used when it is very improbable (or even impossible) for the property in question to be extended or changed in the future. In any other case, a string value is used instead, with libgdata providing `#define`d values for the known values of the property. These values should be used as much as possible by applications which use libgdata (i.e. they should be treated as if they were enumerated values), but applications are free to use strings of their own, too. All validation of such pseudo-enums is left to the server.

One situation where it is acceptable to use enumerated types is in API which is only ever used to query the server, and isn't involved in processing or representing the response at all, i.e. subclasses of GDataQuery.

### String Constants

As the GData protocol is XML-based, it makes extensive use of string constants, typically as enumerated types or namespaced URIs. To stop the authors of applications which use libgdata from having to continually look up the correct "magic strings" to use, all such strings should be `#define`d in libgdata, and referenced in the appropriate function documentation.

### New Services

The API required to implement support for a new service using libgdata is not publicly exposed. This is because doing so would clutter the API to a large extent; for example, exposing various properties as writeable which are currently only readable. While the freedom for users of libgdata to write their own services is a good one, it is outweighed by the muddlement that this would bring to the API.

Furthermore, since it is highly unlikely that anyone except Google will use GData as a basis for communicating with their service, there is little harm in restricting the implementation of services to libgdata. If someone wants to implement support for a new GData service, it is for the benefit of everyone if this implementation is done in libgdata itself, rather than their application.

### Cancellable Support

As libgdata is a network library, it has to be able to deal with operations which take a long (and indeterminate) amount of time due to network latencies. As well as providing asynchronous operation support, every such operation in libgdata is cancellable, using GCancellable.

Using GCancellable, any ongoing libgdata operation can be cancelled from any other thread by calling `g_cancellable_cancel`. If the ongoing operation is doing network activity, the operation will be cancelled as safely as possible (although the server's state cannot be guaranteed when cancelling a non-idempotent operation, such as an insertion or update, since the server may have already committed the results of the operation, but might not have returned them to libgdata yet) and the operation will return to its calling function with a `G_IO_ERROR_CANCELLED` error. Similarly, if the operation is yet to do network activity, it will return with the above error before the network activity is started, leaving the server unchanged.

However, if the operation has finished its network activity, libgdata does not guarantee that it will return with an error — it may return successfully. There is no way to fix this, as it is an inherent race condition between checking for cancellation for the last time, and returning the successful result. Rather than reduce the probability of the race condition occurring, but still have the possibility of it occurring, libgdata will just continue to process an operation after its network activity is over, and return success.

This may be useful in situations where the user is cancelling an operation due to it taking too long; the application using libgdata may want to make use of the result of the operation, even if it has previously tried to cancel the operation after network activity finished.

The behaviour of cancellation in libgdata can be represented as follows:

Figure 3.

The behaviour of cancellation in libgdata.

### Privacy

Privacy is an important consideration with code such as libgdata's, which handles valuable data such as people's address books and Google Account login details.

Unfortunately, it's infeasible for libgdata to ensure that no private data is ever leaked from a process. To do this properly would require almost all the data allocated by libgdata (and all the libraries it depends on, all the way down to the TLS implementation) to use non-pageable memory for all network requests and responses, and to be careful about zeroing them before freeing them. There isn't enough support for this level of paranoia in the lower levels of the stack (such as libsoup).

However, it is feasible to ensure that the user's password and authentication/authorization tokens aren't leaked. This is done in several ways in libgdata:

- If libgdata is compiled with libgcr support enabled (using the `--enable-gnome` configuration flag), it will use libgcr's support for non-pageable memory. This will try hard to avoid passwords and auth. tokens being paged out to disk at any point (although there are circumstances, such as when hibernating, where this is unavoidable).

  Otherwise, libgdata will ensure that passwords and auth. tokens are zeroed out in memory before being freed, which lowers the chance of them reaching disk at a later stage.

- Unless run with `LIBGDATA_DEBUG` set to `4`, libgdata will attempt to redact all usernames, passwords and auth. tokens from debug log output. This aims to prevent accidental disclosure of passwords, etc. in bug reports. Currently, this is implemented using a fixed set of search patterns, so it's possible that certain bits of private information will not be redacted; any such occurrence is a bug which should be reported on GNOME Bugzilla.